Rwanda vs East Timor: Time to export: Documentary compliance (hours)
Time to export: Documentary compliance (hours) over time
- Rwanda
- East Timor
How they compare
East Timor currently reports 33 DB16-20 methodology against 30 DB16-20 methodology in Rwanda, a difference of 3 DB16-20 methodology.
That makes East Timor's figure about 1.1 times Rwanda's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 6 shared years of data; in 2014 it was Rwanda ahead.
Rwanda ranks 87th and East Timor ranks 84th of 186 countries.
Rwanda has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher time to export: documentary compliance (hours), Rwanda or East Timor?
- East Timor, at 33 DB16-20 methodology against 30 DB16-20 methodology in Rwanda as of 2019.
- What is the difference in time to export: documentary compliance (hours) between Rwanda and East Timor?
- 3 DB16-20 methodology, with East Timor ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Rwanda and East Timor?
- 6 years are reported by both, from 2014 to 2019.
- How do Rwanda and East Timor rank globally for time to export: documentary compliance (hours)?
- Rwanda ranks 87th and East Timor ranks 84th of 186 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Time to export: Documentary compliance (hours) (DB16-20 methodology). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The time for documentary compliance to export records the time associated with compliance with the export documentary requirements of all government agencies of the origin economy, the destination economy and any transit economies. It is calculated in hours. It includes the time for obtaining documents; preparing documents; processing documents; presenting documents; and submitting documents. All electronic or paper submissions of information requested by any government agency in connection with the shipment are considered to be documents obtained, prepared and submitted during the export process. All documents prepared by the freight forwarder or customs broker for the product and partner pair assumed in the case study are included regardless of whether they are required by law or in practice. The component indicator is computed based on the methodology in the DB16-20 studies.