South Korea vs Sweden: Time to export: Documentary compliance (hours)
Time to export: Documentary compliance (hours) over time
- South Korea
- Sweden
How they compare
South Korea currently reports 1 DB16-20 methodology against 1 DB16-20 methodology in Sweden, a difference of 0 DB16-20 methodology.
Across all 6 years both countries report, Sweden has been ahead every year.
South Korea ranks 161st and Sweden ranks 161st of 186 countries.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher time to export: documentary compliance (hours), South Korea or Sweden?
- South Korea, at 1 DB16-20 methodology against 1 DB16-20 methodology in Sweden as of 2019.
- What is the difference in time to export: documentary compliance (hours) between South Korea and Sweden?
- 0 DB16-20 methodology, with South Korea ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for South Korea and Sweden?
- 6 years are reported by both, from 2014 to 2019.
- How do South Korea and Sweden rank globally for time to export: documentary compliance (hours)?
- South Korea ranks 161st and Sweden ranks 161st of 186 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Time to export: Documentary compliance (hours) (DB16-20 methodology). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The time for documentary compliance to export records the time associated with compliance with the export documentary requirements of all government agencies of the origin economy, the destination economy and any transit economies. It is calculated in hours. It includes the time for obtaining documents; preparing documents; processing documents; presenting documents; and submitting documents. All electronic or paper submissions of information requested by any government agency in connection with the shipment are considered to be documents obtained, prepared and submitted during the export process. All documents prepared by the freight forwarder or customs broker for the product and partner pair assumed in the case study are included regardless of whether they are required by law or in practice. The component indicator is computed based on the methodology in the DB16-20 studies.