Guyana vs Iraq: Time to export: Documentary compliance (hours)
Time to export: Documentary compliance (hours) over time
- Guyana
- Iraq
How they compare
Iraq currently reports 504 DB16-20 methodology against 200 DB16-20 methodology in Guyana, a difference of 304 DB16-20 methodology.
That makes Iraq's figure about 2.5 times Guyana's.
Across all 6 years both countries report, Iraq has been ahead every year.
Guyana ranks 4th and Iraq ranks 2nd of 186 countries.
Iraq has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher time to export: documentary compliance (hours), Guyana or Iraq?
- Iraq, at 504 DB16-20 methodology against 200 DB16-20 methodology in Guyana as of 2019.
- What is the difference in time to export: documentary compliance (hours) between Guyana and Iraq?
- 304 DB16-20 methodology, with Iraq ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Guyana and Iraq?
- 6 years are reported by both, from 2014 to 2019.
- How do Guyana and Iraq rank globally for time to export: documentary compliance (hours)?
- Guyana ranks 4th and Iraq ranks 2nd of 186 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Time to export: Documentary compliance (hours) (DB16-20 methodology). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The time for documentary compliance to export records the time associated with compliance with the export documentary requirements of all government agencies of the origin economy, the destination economy and any transit economies. It is calculated in hours. It includes the time for obtaining documents; preparing documents; processing documents; presenting documents; and submitting documents. All electronic or paper submissions of information requested by any government agency in connection with the shipment are considered to be documents obtained, prepared and submitted during the export process. All documents prepared by the freight forwarder or customs broker for the product and partner pair assumed in the case study are included regardless of whether they are required by law or in practice. The component indicator is computed based on the methodology in the DB16-20 studies.