Guinea-Bissau vs Indonesia: Time to export: Documentary compliance (hours)
Time to export: Documentary compliance (hours) over time
- Guinea-Bissau
- Indonesia
How they compare
Indonesia currently reports 61.32 DB16-20 methodology against 60 DB16-20 methodology in Guinea-Bissau, a difference of 1.32 DB16-20 methodology.
Across all 6 years both countries report, Indonesia has been ahead every year.
Guinea-Bissau ranks 49th and Indonesia ranks 48th of 186 countries.
Indonesia has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher time to export: documentary compliance (hours), Guinea-Bissau or Indonesia?
- Indonesia, at 61.32 DB16-20 methodology against 60 DB16-20 methodology in Guinea-Bissau as of 2019.
- What is the difference in time to export: documentary compliance (hours) between Guinea-Bissau and Indonesia?
- 1.32 DB16-20 methodology, with Indonesia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Guinea-Bissau and Indonesia?
- 6 years are reported by both, from 2014 to 2019.
- How do Guinea-Bissau and Indonesia rank globally for time to export: documentary compliance (hours)?
- Guinea-Bissau ranks 49th and Indonesia ranks 48th of 186 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Time to export: Documentary compliance (hours) (DB16-20 methodology). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The time for documentary compliance to export records the time associated with compliance with the export documentary requirements of all government agencies of the origin economy, the destination economy and any transit economies. It is calculated in hours. It includes the time for obtaining documents; preparing documents; processing documents; presenting documents; and submitting documents. All electronic or paper submissions of information requested by any government agency in connection with the shipment are considered to be documents obtained, prepared and submitted during the export process. All documents prepared by the freight forwarder or customs broker for the product and partner pair assumed in the case study are included regardless of whether they are required by law or in practice. The component indicator is computed based on the methodology in the DB16-20 studies.