Guatemala vs Maldives: Time to export: Documentary compliance (hours)
Time to export: Documentary compliance (hours) over time
- Guatemala
- Maldives
How they compare
Guatemala currently reports 48 DB16-20 methodology against 48 DB16-20 methodology in Maldives, a difference of 0 DB16-20 methodology.
Across all 6 years both countries report, Maldives has been ahead every year.
Guatemala ranks 61st and Maldives ranks 61st of 186 countries.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher time to export: documentary compliance (hours), Guatemala or Maldives?
- Guatemala, at 48 DB16-20 methodology against 48 DB16-20 methodology in Maldives as of 2019.
- What is the difference in time to export: documentary compliance (hours) between Guatemala and Maldives?
- 0 DB16-20 methodology, with Guatemala ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Guatemala and Maldives?
- 6 years are reported by both, from 2014 to 2019.
- How do Guatemala and Maldives rank globally for time to export: documentary compliance (hours)?
- Guatemala ranks 61st and Maldives ranks 61st of 186 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Time to export: Documentary compliance (hours) (DB16-20 methodology). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The time for documentary compliance to export records the time associated with compliance with the export documentary requirements of all government agencies of the origin economy, the destination economy and any transit economies. It is calculated in hours. It includes the time for obtaining documents; preparing documents; processing documents; presenting documents; and submitting documents. All electronic or paper submissions of information requested by any government agency in connection with the shipment are considered to be documents obtained, prepared and submitted during the export process. All documents prepared by the freight forwarder or customs broker for the product and partner pair assumed in the case study are included regardless of whether they are required by law or in practice. The component indicator is computed based on the methodology in the DB16-20 studies.