Equatorial Guinea vs Sudan: Time to export: Documentary compliance (hours)
Time to export: Documentary compliance (hours) over time
- Equatorial Guinea
- Sudan
How they compare
Sudan currently reports 190 DB16-20 methodology against 154 DB16-20 methodology in Equatorial Guinea, a difference of 36 DB16-20 methodology.
That makes Sudan's figure about 1.2 times Equatorial Guinea's.
Across all 6 years both countries report, Sudan has been ahead every year.
Equatorial Guinea ranks 10th and Sudan ranks 7th of 186 countries.
Sudan has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher time to export: documentary compliance (hours), Equatorial Guinea or Sudan?
- Sudan, at 190 DB16-20 methodology against 154 DB16-20 methodology in Equatorial Guinea as of 2019.
- What is the difference in time to export: documentary compliance (hours) between Equatorial Guinea and Sudan?
- 36 DB16-20 methodology, with Sudan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Equatorial Guinea and Sudan?
- 6 years are reported by both, from 2014 to 2019.
- How do Equatorial Guinea and Sudan rank globally for time to export: documentary compliance (hours)?
- Equatorial Guinea ranks 10th and Sudan ranks 7th of 186 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Time to export: Documentary compliance (hours) (DB16-20 methodology). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The time for documentary compliance to export records the time associated with compliance with the export documentary requirements of all government agencies of the origin economy, the destination economy and any transit economies. It is calculated in hours. It includes the time for obtaining documents; preparing documents; processing documents; presenting documents; and submitting documents. All electronic or paper submissions of information requested by any government agency in connection with the shipment are considered to be documents obtained, prepared and submitted during the export process. All documents prepared by the freight forwarder or customs broker for the product and partner pair assumed in the case study are included regardless of whether they are required by law or in practice. The component indicator is computed based on the methodology in the DB16-20 studies.