Argentina vs Uganda: Time to export: Documentary compliance (hours)
Time to export: Documentary compliance (hours) over time
- Argentina
- Uganda
How they compare
Argentina currently reports 25 DB16-20 methodology against 24 DB16-20 methodology in Uganda, a difference of 1 DB16-20 methodology.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 6 shared years of data; in 2014 it was Uganda ahead.
Argentina ranks 93rd and Uganda ranks 94th of 186 countries.
Uganda has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher time to export: documentary compliance (hours), Argentina or Uganda?
- Argentina, at 25 DB16-20 methodology against 24 DB16-20 methodology in Uganda as of 2019.
- What is the difference in time to export: documentary compliance (hours) between Argentina and Uganda?
- 1 DB16-20 methodology, with Argentina ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Argentina and Uganda?
- 6 years are reported by both, from 2014 to 2019.
- How do Argentina and Uganda rank globally for time to export: documentary compliance (hours)?
- Argentina ranks 93rd and Uganda ranks 94th of 186 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Time to export: Documentary compliance (hours) (DB16-20 methodology). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The time for documentary compliance to export records the time associated with compliance with the export documentary requirements of all government agencies of the origin economy, the destination economy and any transit economies. It is calculated in hours. It includes the time for obtaining documents; preparing documents; processing documents; presenting documents; and submitting documents. All electronic or paper submissions of information requested by any government agency in connection with the shipment are considered to be documents obtained, prepared and submitted during the export process. All documents prepared by the freight forwarder or customs broker for the product and partner pair assumed in the case study are included regardless of whether they are required by law or in practice. The component indicator is computed based on the methodology in the DB16-20 studies.