East Timor vs Uganda: Time to export (days)
Time to export (days) over time
- East Timor
- Uganda
How they compare
East Timor currently reports 28 DB06-15 methodology against 28 DB06-15 methodology in Uganda, a difference of 0 DB06-15 methodology.
Across all 10 years both countries report, Uganda has been ahead every year.
East Timor ranks 35th and Uganda ranks 35th of 181 countries.
Uganda has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | East Timor | Uganda | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 28 DB06-15 methodology | 35.8 DB06-15 methodology | 7.8 DB06-15 methodology | Uganda |
| 2010s | 28 DB06-15 methodology | 31.4 DB06-15 methodology | 3.4 DB06-15 methodology | Uganda |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher time to export (days), East Timor or Uganda?
- East Timor, at 28 DB06-15 methodology against 28 DB06-15 methodology in Uganda as of 2014.
- What is the difference in time to export (days) between East Timor and Uganda?
- 0 DB06-15 methodology, with East Timor ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for East Timor and Uganda?
- 10 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2014.
- How do East Timor and Uganda rank globally for time to export (days)?
- East Timor ranks 35th and Uganda ranks 35th of 181 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Time to export (days) (DB06-15 methodology). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The time to export records the time associated with exporting a standardized cargo of goods by sea transport through 4 predefined stages: document preparation; customs clearance and inspections; inland transport and handling; and port and terminal handling. It is calculated in calendar days. The time calculation for each of the 4 predefined stages starts from the moment the stage is initiated and runs until it is completed. Fast-track procedures applying only to firms located in an export processing zone, or only to certain accredited firms under authorized economic operator programs, are not taken into account because they are not available to all trading companies. Sea transport time is not included. It is assumed that neither the exporter nor the importer wastes time and that each commits to completing the process without delay. It is assumed that document preparation, inland transport and handling, customs clearance and inspections, and port and terminal handling require a minimum time of 1 day each and cannot take place simultaneously. The component indicator is computed based on the methodology in the DB06-15 studies.