Bolivia vs Suriname: Time to export (days)
Time to export (days) over time
- Bolivia
- Suriname
How they compare
Bolivia currently reports 22 DB06-15 methodology against 22 DB06-15 methodology in Suriname, a difference of 0 DB06-15 methodology.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 10 shared years of data; in 2005 it was Bolivia ahead.
Bolivia ranks 59th and Suriname ranks 59th of 181 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Bolivia averaged higher in 1 and Suriname in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Bolivia | Suriname | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 22 DB06-15 methodology | 20 DB06-15 methodology | 2 DB06-15 methodology | Bolivia |
| 2010s | 20 DB06-15 methodology | 21.2 DB06-15 methodology | 1.2 DB06-15 methodology | Suriname |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher time to export (days), Bolivia or Suriname?
- Bolivia, at 22 DB06-15 methodology against 22 DB06-15 methodology in Suriname as of 2014.
- What is the difference in time to export (days) between Bolivia and Suriname?
- 0 DB06-15 methodology, with Bolivia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Bolivia and Suriname?
- 10 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2014.
- How do Bolivia and Suriname rank globally for time to export (days)?
- Bolivia ranks 59th and Suriname ranks 59th of 181 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Time to export (days) (DB06-15 methodology). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The time to export records the time associated with exporting a standardized cargo of goods by sea transport through 4 predefined stages: document preparation; customs clearance and inspections; inland transport and handling; and port and terminal handling. It is calculated in calendar days. The time calculation for each of the 4 predefined stages starts from the moment the stage is initiated and runs until it is completed. Fast-track procedures applying only to firms located in an export processing zone, or only to certain accredited firms under authorized economic operator programs, are not taken into account because they are not available to all trading companies. Sea transport time is not included. It is assumed that neither the exporter nor the importer wastes time and that each commits to completing the process without delay. It is assumed that document preparation, inland transport and handling, customs clearance and inspections, and port and terminal handling require a minimum time of 1 day each and cannot take place simultaneously. The component indicator is computed based on the methodology in the DB06-15 studies.