Palau vs Uruguay: Time to export: Border compliance (hours)
Time to export: Border compliance (hours) over time
- Palau
- Uruguay
How they compare
Palau currently reports 101.71 DB16-20 methodology against 96 DB16-20 methodology in Uruguay, a difference of 5.71 DB16-20 methodology.
That makes Palau's figure about 1.1 times Uruguay's.
Across all 6 years both countries report, Palau has been ahead every year.
Palau ranks 28th and Uruguay ranks 31st of 186 countries.
Palau has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher time to export: border compliance (hours), Palau or Uruguay?
- Palau, at 101.71 DB16-20 methodology against 96 DB16-20 methodology in Uruguay as of 2019.
- What is the difference in time to export: border compliance (hours) between Palau and Uruguay?
- 5.71 DB16-20 methodology, with Palau ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Palau and Uruguay?
- 6 years are reported by both, from 2014 to 2019.
- How do Palau and Uruguay rank globally for time to export: border compliance (hours)?
- Palau ranks 28th and Uruguay ranks 31st of 186 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Time to export: Border compliance (hours) (DB16-20 methodology). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The time for border compliance to export records the time associated with compliance with the economy’s customs regulations and with regulations relating to other inspections that are mandatory in order for the export shipment to cross the economy’s border, as well as the time and cost for handling that takes place at its port or border. It is calulcated in hours. The time for this segment includes time for customs clearance and inspection procedures conducted by other agencies. If all customs clearance and other inspections take place at the port or border at the same time, the time estimate for border compliance takes this simultaneity into account. The component indicator is computed based on the methodology in the DB16-20 studies.