Maldives vs Papua New Guinea: Time to export: Border compliance (hours)
Time to export: Border compliance (hours) over time
- Maldives
- Papua New Guinea
How they compare
Maldives currently reports 42 DB16-20 methodology against 42 DB16-20 methodology in Papua New Guinea, a difference of 0 DB16-20 methodology.
Across all 6 years both countries report, Papua New Guinea has been ahead every year.
Maldives ranks 95th and Papua New Guinea ranks 95th of 186 countries.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher time to export: border compliance (hours), Maldives or Papua New Guinea?
- Maldives, at 42 DB16-20 methodology against 42 DB16-20 methodology in Papua New Guinea as of 2019.
- What is the difference in time to export: border compliance (hours) between Maldives and Papua New Guinea?
- 0 DB16-20 methodology, with Maldives ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Maldives and Papua New Guinea?
- 6 years are reported by both, from 2014 to 2019.
- How do Maldives and Papua New Guinea rank globally for time to export: border compliance (hours)?
- Maldives ranks 95th and Papua New Guinea ranks 95th of 186 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Time to export: Border compliance (hours) (DB16-20 methodology). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The time for border compliance to export records the time associated with compliance with the economy’s customs regulations and with regulations relating to other inspections that are mandatory in order for the export shipment to cross the economy’s border, as well as the time and cost for handling that takes place at its port or border. It is calulcated in hours. The time for this segment includes time for customs clearance and inspection procedures conducted by other agencies. If all customs clearance and other inspections take place at the port or border at the same time, the time estimate for border compliance takes this simultaneity into account. The component indicator is computed based on the methodology in the DB16-20 studies.