Guyana vs Nicaragua: Time to export: Border compliance (hours)
Time to export: Border compliance (hours) over time
- Guyana
- Nicaragua
How they compare
Guyana currently reports 72 DB16-20 methodology against 72 DB16-20 methodology in Nicaragua, a difference of 0 DB16-20 methodology.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 6 shared years of data; in 2014 it was Guyana ahead.
Guyana ranks 51st and Nicaragua ranks 51st of 186 countries.
Guyana has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher time to export: border compliance (hours), Guyana or Nicaragua?
- Guyana, at 72 DB16-20 methodology against 72 DB16-20 methodology in Nicaragua as of 2019.
- What is the difference in time to export: border compliance (hours) between Guyana and Nicaragua?
- 0 DB16-20 methodology, with Guyana ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Guyana and Nicaragua?
- 6 years are reported by both, from 2014 to 2019.
- How do Guyana and Nicaragua rank globally for time to export: border compliance (hours)?
- Guyana ranks 51st and Nicaragua ranks 51st of 186 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Time to export: Border compliance (hours) (DB16-20 methodology). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The time for border compliance to export records the time associated with compliance with the economy’s customs regulations and with regulations relating to other inspections that are mandatory in order for the export shipment to cross the economy’s border, as well as the time and cost for handling that takes place at its port or border. It is calulcated in hours. The time for this segment includes time for customs clearance and inspection procedures conducted by other agencies. If all customs clearance and other inspections take place at the port or border at the same time, the time estimate for border compliance takes this simultaneity into account. The component indicator is computed based on the methodology in the DB16-20 studies.