El Salvador vs Malta: Time to export: Border compliance (hours)
Time to export: Border compliance (hours) over time
- El Salvador
- Malta
How they compare
El Salvador currently reports 24 DB16-20 methodology against 24 DB16-20 methodology in Malta, a difference of 0 DB16-20 methodology.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 6 shared years of data; in 2014 it was Malta ahead.
El Salvador ranks 122nd and Malta ranks 122nd of 186 countries.
El Salvador has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher time to export: border compliance (hours), El Salvador or Malta?
- El Salvador, at 24 DB16-20 methodology against 24 DB16-20 methodology in Malta as of 2019.
- What is the difference in time to export: border compliance (hours) between El Salvador and Malta?
- 0 DB16-20 methodology, with El Salvador ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for El Salvador and Malta?
- 6 years are reported by both, from 2014 to 2019.
- How do El Salvador and Malta rank globally for time to export: border compliance (hours)?
- El Salvador ranks 122nd and Malta ranks 122nd of 186 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Time to export: Border compliance (hours) (DB16-20 methodology). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The time for border compliance to export records the time associated with compliance with the economy’s customs regulations and with regulations relating to other inspections that are mandatory in order for the export shipment to cross the economy’s border, as well as the time and cost for handling that takes place at its port or border. It is calulcated in hours. The time for this segment includes time for customs clearance and inspection procedures conducted by other agencies. If all customs clearance and other inspections take place at the port or border at the same time, the time estimate for border compliance takes this simultaneity into account. The component indicator is computed based on the methodology in the DB16-20 studies.