Congo vs Djibouti: Time to export: Border compliance (hours)
Time to export: Border compliance (hours) over time
- Congo
- Djibouti
How they compare
Congo currently reports 276 DB16-20 methodology against 72 DB16-20 methodology in Djibouti, a difference of 204 DB16-20 methodology.
That makes Congo's figure about 3.8 times Djibouti's.
Across all 6 years both countries report, Congo has been ahead every year.
Congo ranks 3rd and Djibouti ranks 1st of 186 countries.
Congo has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher time to export: border compliance (hours), Congo or Djibouti?
- Congo, at 276 DB16-20 methodology against 72 DB16-20 methodology in Djibouti as of 2019.
- What is the difference in time to export: border compliance (hours) between Congo and Djibouti?
- 204 DB16-20 methodology, with Congo ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Congo and Djibouti?
- 6 years are reported by both, from 2014 to 2019.
- How do Congo and Djibouti rank globally for time to export: border compliance (hours)?
- Congo ranks 3rd and Djibouti ranks 1st of 186 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Time to export: Border compliance (hours) (DB16-20 methodology). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The time for border compliance to export records the time associated with compliance with the economy’s customs regulations and with regulations relating to other inspections that are mandatory in order for the export shipment to cross the economy’s border, as well as the time and cost for handling that takes place at its port or border. It is calulcated in hours. The time for this segment includes time for customs clearance and inspection procedures conducted by other agencies. If all customs clearance and other inspections take place at the port or border at the same time, the time estimate for border compliance takes this simultaneity into account. The component indicator is computed based on the methodology in the DB16-20 studies.