China vs Cyprus: Time to export: Border compliance (hours)
Time to export: Border compliance (hours) over time
- China
- Cyprus
How they compare
China currently reports 20.7 DB16-20 methodology against 18 DB16-20 methodology in Cyprus, a difference of 2.7 DB16-20 methodology.
That makes China's figure about 1.1 times Cyprus's.
Across all 6 years both countries report, China has been ahead every year.
China ranks 132nd and Cyprus ranks 135th of 189 countries.
China has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher time to export: border compliance (hours), China or Cyprus?
- China, at 20.7 DB16-20 methodology against 18 DB16-20 methodology in Cyprus as of 2019.
- What is the difference in time to export: border compliance (hours) between China and Cyprus?
- 2.7 DB16-20 methodology, with China ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for China and Cyprus?
- 6 years are reported by both, from 2014 to 2019.
- How do China and Cyprus rank globally for time to export: border compliance (hours)?
- China ranks 132nd and Cyprus ranks 135th of 189 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Time to export: Border compliance (hours) (DB16-20 methodology). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The time for border compliance to export records the time associated with compliance with the economy’s customs regulations and with regulations relating to other inspections that are mandatory in order for the export shipment to cross the economy’s border, as well as the time and cost for handling that takes place at its port or border. It is calulcated in hours. The time for this segment includes time for customs clearance and inspection procedures conducted by other agencies. If all customs clearance and other inspections take place at the port or border at the same time, the time estimate for border compliance takes this simultaneity into account. The component indicator is computed based on the methodology in the DB16-20 studies.