Angola vs Sudan: Time to export: Border compliance (hours)
Time to export: Border compliance (hours) over time
- Angola
- Sudan
How they compare
Sudan currently reports 180 DB16-20 methodology against 164 DB16-20 methodology in Angola, a difference of 16 DB16-20 methodology.
That makes Sudan's figure about 1.1 times Angola's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 6 shared years of data; in 2014 it was Angola ahead.
Angola ranks 9th and Sudan ranks 7th of 186 countries.
Angola has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher time to export: border compliance (hours), Angola or Sudan?
- Sudan, at 180 DB16-20 methodology against 164 DB16-20 methodology in Angola as of 2019.
- What is the difference in time to export: border compliance (hours) between Angola and Sudan?
- 16 DB16-20 methodology, with Sudan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Angola and Sudan?
- 6 years are reported by both, from 2014 to 2019.
- How do Angola and Sudan rank globally for time to export: border compliance (hours)?
- Angola ranks 9th and Sudan ranks 7th of 186 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Time to export: Border compliance (hours) (DB16-20 methodology). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The time for border compliance to export records the time associated with compliance with the economy’s customs regulations and with regulations relating to other inspections that are mandatory in order for the export shipment to cross the economy’s border, as well as the time and cost for handling that takes place at its port or border. It is calulcated in hours. The time for this segment includes time for customs clearance and inspection procedures conducted by other agencies. If all customs clearance and other inspections take place at the port or border at the same time, the time estimate for border compliance takes this simultaneity into account. The component indicator is computed based on the methodology in the DB16-20 studies.