KIR vs NAM: Reported cases of paralytic polio
KIR
0 cases
in 2000
NAM
0 cases
in 2023
KIR rank
26th
NAM rank
26th
Reported cases of paralytic polio over time
- KIR
- NAM
How they compare
KIR currently reports 0 cases against 0 cases in NAM, a difference of 0 cases.
Across all 12 years both countries report, NAM has been ahead every year.
KIR ranks 26th and NAM ranks 26th of 199 countries.
NAM has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | KIR | NAM | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1980s | 0 cases | 1 cases | 1 cases | NAM |
| 1990s | 0 cases | 8.7 cases | 8.7 cases | NAM |
| 2000s | 0 cases | 0 cases | 0 cases | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher reported cases of paralytic polio, KIR or NAM?
- KIR, at 0 cases against 0 cases in NAM as of 2000.
- What is the difference in reported cases of paralytic polio between KIR and NAM?
- 0 cases, with KIR ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for KIR and NAM?
- 12 years are reported by both, from 1989 to 2000.
- How do KIR and NAM rank globally for reported cases of paralytic polio?
- KIR ranks 26th and NAM ranks 26th of 199 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- World Health Organization (2019); World Health Organization (2024) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Reported cases of paralytic polio. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The sum of wild poliovirus cases and circulating vaccine derived poliovirus cases.