Aruba vs Guinea-Bissau: Terrestrial protected areas
Aruba
26.9
in 2025
Guinea-Bissau
26.2
in 2025
Aruba rank
54th
Guinea-Bissau rank
57th
Terrestrial protected areas over time
- Aruba
- Guinea-Bissau
How they compare
Aruba currently reports 26.9 against 26.2 in Guinea-Bissau, a difference of 0.7.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 13 shared years of data; in 2013 it was Guinea-Bissau ahead.
Aruba ranks 54th and Guinea-Bissau ranks 57th of 213 countries.
Guinea-Bissau has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Aruba | Guinea-Bissau | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 8.39 | 16.49 | 8.1 | Guinea-Bissau |
| 2020s | 20.37 | 26.53 | 6.17 | Guinea-Bissau |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher terrestrial protected areas, Aruba or Guinea-Bissau?
- Aruba, at 26.9 against 26.2 in Guinea-Bissau as of 2025.
- What is the difference in terrestrial protected areas between Aruba and Guinea-Bissau?
- 0.7, with Aruba ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Aruba and Guinea-Bissau?
- 13 years are reported by both, from 2013 to 2025.
- How do Aruba and Guinea-Bissau rank globally for terrestrial protected areas?
- Aruba ranks 54th and Guinea-Bissau ranks 57th of 213 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Our World in Data, published as Terrestrial protected areas. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.