Luxembourg vs Portugal: Teaching staff compensation as a percentage of total expenditure in
Teaching staff compensation as a percentage of total expenditure in over time
- Luxembourg
- Portugal
How they compare
Luxembourg currently reports 72.8% against 71.9% in Portugal, a difference of 0.9%.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 14 shared years of data; in 2003 it was Portugal ahead.
Luxembourg ranks 11th and Portugal ranks 14th of 57 countries.
Portugal has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Luxembourg | Portugal | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 62.5% | 78.6% | 16.1% | Portugal |
| 2010s | 71.1% | 71.9% | 0.8% | Portugal |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher teaching staff compensation as a percentage of total expenditure in, Luxembourg or Portugal?
- Luxembourg, at 72.8% against 71.9% in Portugal as of 2017.
- What is the difference in teaching staff compensation as a percentage of total expenditure in between Luxembourg and Portugal?
- 0.9%, with Luxembourg ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Luxembourg and Portugal?
- 14 years are reported by both, from 2003 to 2017.
- How do Luxembourg and Portugal rank globally for teaching staff compensation as a percentage of total expenditure in?
- Luxembourg ranks 11th and Portugal ranks 14th of 57 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- UNESCO Institute for Statistics, published as Teaching staff compensation as a percentage of total expenditure in upper secondary public institutions (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Teacher compensation expressed as a percentage of direct expenditure in public educational institutions (instructional and non-instructional) of the specified level of education. Financial aid to students and other transfers are excluded from direct expenditure. Staff compensation includes salaries, contributions by employers for staff retirement programmes, and other allowances and benefits. To calculate this indicator, divide teacher compensation in public institutions of a given level of education (ex. primary, secondary, or all levels combined) by total expenditure (current and capital) in public institutions of the same level of education, and multiply by 100. Limitations: Although countries responding to the UIS questionnaire on educational expenditure are required to follow common definitions for staff compensation, in some cases government budget classifications may differ. It is also often difficult to separate staff compensation between teachers and non-teachers, as these are usually grouped together in country's accounting systems. In general, respondent countries must use estimation methods to separate teacher and non-teacher staff compensation. For more information, consult the UNESCO Institute of Statistics website: http://www.uis.unesco.org/Education/