Ecuador vs Luxembourg: Teaching staff compensation as a percentage of total expenditure in
Teaching staff compensation as a percentage of total expenditure in over time
- Ecuador
- Luxembourg
How they compare
Luxembourg currently reports 72.8% against 72.4% in Ecuador, a difference of 0.4%.
Across all 7 years both countries report, Ecuador has been ahead every year.
Ecuador ranks 13th and Luxembourg ranks 11th of 57 countries.
Ecuador has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Ecuador | Luxembourg | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 85.1% | 63.9% | 21.2% | Ecuador |
| 2010s | 81.1% | 70.8% | 10.3% | Ecuador |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher teaching staff compensation as a percentage of total expenditure in, Ecuador or Luxembourg?
- Luxembourg, at 72.8% against 72.4% in Ecuador as of 2017.
- What is the difference in teaching staff compensation as a percentage of total expenditure in between Ecuador and Luxembourg?
- 0.4%, with Luxembourg ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Ecuador and Luxembourg?
- 7 years are reported by both, from 2009 to 2015.
- How do Ecuador and Luxembourg rank globally for teaching staff compensation as a percentage of total expenditure in?
- Ecuador ranks 13th and Luxembourg ranks 11th of 57 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- UNESCO Institute for Statistics, published as Teaching staff compensation as a percentage of total expenditure in upper secondary public institutions (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Teacher compensation expressed as a percentage of direct expenditure in public educational institutions (instructional and non-instructional) of the specified level of education. Financial aid to students and other transfers are excluded from direct expenditure. Staff compensation includes salaries, contributions by employers for staff retirement programmes, and other allowances and benefits. To calculate this indicator, divide teacher compensation in public institutions of a given level of education (ex. primary, secondary, or all levels combined) by total expenditure (current and capital) in public institutions of the same level of education, and multiply by 100. Limitations: Although countries responding to the UIS questionnaire on educational expenditure are required to follow common definitions for staff compensation, in some cases government budget classifications may differ. It is also often difficult to separate staff compensation between teachers and non-teachers, as these are usually grouped together in country's accounting systems. In general, respondent countries must use estimation methods to separate teacher and non-teacher staff compensation. For more information, consult the UNESCO Institute of Statistics website: http://www.uis.unesco.org/Education/