Australia vs Lithuania: Teaching staff compensation as a percentage of total expenditure in
Teaching staff compensation as a percentage of total expenditure in over time
- Australia
- Lithuania
How they compare
Australia currently reports 51.1% against 50.9% in Lithuania, a difference of 0.2%.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 6 shared years of data; in 2010 it was Lithuania ahead.
Australia ranks 38th and Lithuania ranks 39th of 57 countries.
Lithuania has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher teaching staff compensation as a percentage of total expenditure in, Australia or Lithuania?
- Australia, at 51.1% against 50.9% in Lithuania as of 2017.
- What is the difference in teaching staff compensation as a percentage of total expenditure in between Australia and Lithuania?
- 0.2%, with Australia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Australia and Lithuania?
- 6 years are reported by both, from 2010 to 2017.
- How do Australia and Lithuania rank globally for teaching staff compensation as a percentage of total expenditure in?
- Australia ranks 38th and Lithuania ranks 39th of 57 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- UNESCO Institute for Statistics, published as Teaching staff compensation as a percentage of total expenditure in upper secondary public institutions (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Teacher compensation expressed as a percentage of direct expenditure in public educational institutions (instructional and non-instructional) of the specified level of education. Financial aid to students and other transfers are excluded from direct expenditure. Staff compensation includes salaries, contributions by employers for staff retirement programmes, and other allowances and benefits. To calculate this indicator, divide teacher compensation in public institutions of a given level of education (ex. primary, secondary, or all levels combined) by total expenditure (current and capital) in public institutions of the same level of education, and multiply by 100. Limitations: Although countries responding to the UIS questionnaire on educational expenditure are required to follow common definitions for staff compensation, in some cases government budget classifications may differ. It is also often difficult to separate staff compensation between teachers and non-teachers, as these are usually grouped together in country's accounting systems. In general, respondent countries must use estimation methods to separate teacher and non-teacher staff compensation. For more information, consult the UNESCO Institute of Statistics website: http://www.uis.unesco.org/Education/