Czechia vs Malta: Teaching staff compensation as a percentage of total expenditure in
Teaching staff compensation as a percentage of total expenditure in over time
- Czechia
- Malta
How they compare
Czechia currently reports 38.1% against 38.0% in Malta, a difference of 0.1%.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 14 shared years of data; in 1998 it was Malta ahead.
Czechia ranks 65th and Malta ranks 66th of 67 countries.
Malta has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Czechia | Malta | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 41.8% | 48.7% | 7.0% | Malta |
| 2000s | 43.6% | 52.5% | 8.8% | Malta |
| 2010s | 39.5% | 54.0% | 14.4% | Malta |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher teaching staff compensation as a percentage of total expenditure in, Czechia or Malta?
- Czechia, at 38.1% against 38.0% in Malta as of 2017.
- What is the difference in teaching staff compensation as a percentage of total expenditure in between Czechia and Malta?
- 0.1%, with Czechia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Czechia and Malta?
- 14 years are reported by both, from 1998 to 2017.
- How do Czechia and Malta rank globally for teaching staff compensation as a percentage of total expenditure in?
- Czechia ranks 65th and Malta ranks 66th of 67 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- UNESCO Institute for Statistics, published as Teaching staff compensation as a percentage of total expenditure in primary public institutions (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Teacher compensation expressed as a percentage of direct expenditure in public educational institutions (instructional and non-instructional) of the specified level of education. Financial aid to students and other transfers are excluded from direct expenditure. Staff compensation includes salaries, contributions by employers for staff retirement programmes, and other allowances and benefits. To calculate this indicator, divide teacher compensation in public institutions of a given level of education (ex. primary, secondary, or all levels combined) by total expenditure (current and capital) in public institutions of the same level of education, and multiply by 100. Limitations: Although countries responding to the UIS questionnaire on educational expenditure are required to follow common definitions for staff compensation, in some cases government budget classifications may differ. It is also often difficult to separate staff compensation between teachers and non-teachers, as these are usually grouped together in country's accounting systems. In general, respondent countries must use estimation methods to separate teacher and non-teacher staff compensation. For more information, consult the UNESCO Institute of Statistics website: http://www.uis.unesco.org/Education/