Jordan vs Lithuania: Teachers in tertiary education ISCED 6, 7 and 8 programmes, female
Teachers in tertiary education ISCED 6, 7 and 8 programmes, female over time
- Jordan
- Lithuania
How they compare
Lithuania currently reports 6,415 number against 5,609 number in Jordan, a difference of 806 number.
That makes Lithuania's figure about 1.1 times Jordan's.
Across all 6 years both countries report, Lithuania has been ahead every year.
Jordan ranks 28th and Lithuania ranks 25th of 71 countries.
Lithuania has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Jordan | Lithuania | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 1,034 number | 4,472 number | 3,437 number | Lithuania |
| 2010s | 4,418 number | 7,139 number | 2,721 number | Lithuania |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher teachers in tertiary education isced 6, 7 and 8 programmes, female, Jordan or Lithuania?
- Lithuania, at 6,415 number against 5,609 number in Jordan as of 2018.
- What is the difference in teachers in tertiary education isced 6, 7 and 8 programmes, female between Jordan and Lithuania?
- 806 number, with Lithuania ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Jordan and Lithuania?
- 6 years are reported by both, from 2003 to 2017.
- How do Jordan and Lithuania rank globally for teachers in tertiary education isced 6, 7 and 8 programmes, female?
- Jordan ranks 28th and Lithuania ranks 25th of 71 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- UNESCO Institute for Statistics, published as Teachers in tertiary education ISCED 6, 7 and 8 programmes, female (number). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Total number of female teachers in public and private short-cycle tertiary education institutions (ISCED 6-8). Teachers are persons employed full time or part time in an official capacity to guide and direct the learning experience of pupils and students, irrespective of their qualifications or the delivery mechanism, i.e. face-to-face and/or at a distance. This definition excludes educational personnel who have no active teaching duties (e.g. headmasters, headmistresses or principals who do not teach) and persons who work occasionally or in a voluntary capacity in educational institutions. For more information, consult the UNESCO Institute of Statistics website: http://www.uis.unesco.org/Education/