Latvia vs Lesotho: Teachers in tertiary education ISCED 5 programmes, both sexes
Teachers in tertiary education ISCED 5 programmes, both sexes over time
- Latvia
- Lesotho
How they compare
Latvia currently reports 1,075 number against 593 number in Lesotho, a difference of 482 number.
That makes Latvia's figure about 1.8 times Lesotho's.
Across all 9 years both countries report, Latvia has been ahead every year.
Latvia ranks 35th and Lesotho ranks 38th of 65 countries.
Latvia has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Latvia | Lesotho | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 504 number | 122 number | 382 number | Latvia |
| 2000s | 860.33 number | 274 number | 586.33 number | Latvia |
| 2010s | 1,037 number | 614.4 number | 422.6 number | Latvia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher teachers in tertiary education isced 5 programmes, both sexes, Latvia or Lesotho?
- Latvia, at 1,075 number against 593 number in Lesotho as of 2018.
- What is the difference in teachers in tertiary education isced 5 programmes, both sexes between Latvia and Lesotho?
- 482 number, with Latvia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Latvia and Lesotho?
- 9 years are reported by both, from 1999 to 2018.
- How do Latvia and Lesotho rank globally for teachers in tertiary education isced 5 programmes, both sexes?
- Latvia ranks 35th and Lesotho ranks 38th of 65 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- UNESCO Institute for Statistics, published as Teachers in tertiary education ISCED 5 programmes, both sexes (number). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Total number of teachers in public and private short-cycle tertiary education institutions (ISCED 5). Teachers are persons employed full time or part time in an official capacity to guide and direct the learning experience of pupils and students, irrespective of their qualifications or the delivery mechanism, i.e. face-to-face and/or at a distance. This definition excludes educational personnel who have no active teaching duties (e.g. headmasters, headmistresses or principals who do not teach) and persons who work occasionally or in a voluntary capacity in educational institutions.