Burundi vs Saint Kitts and Nevis: Tariff rate for primary and manufactured products
Burundi
9.0%
in 2022
Saint Kitts and Nevis
8.8%
in 2020
Burundi rank
48th
Saint Kitts and Nevis rank
51st
Tariff rate for primary and manufactured products over time
- Burundi
- Saint Kitts and Nevis
How they compare
Burundi currently reports 9.0% against 8.8% in Saint Kitts and Nevis, a difference of 0.2%.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 16 shared years of data; in 2002 it was Saint Kitts and Nevis ahead.
Burundi ranks 48th and Saint Kitts and Nevis ranks 51st of 184 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Burundi averaged higher in 2 and Saint Kitts and Nevis in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Burundi | Saint Kitts and Nevis | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 13.6% | 13.5% | 0.1% | Burundi |
| 2010s | 6.8% | 14.3% | 7.5% | Saint Kitts and Nevis |
| 2020s | 11.3% | 8.8% | 2.5% | Burundi |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher tariff rate for primary and manufactured products, Burundi or Saint Kitts and Nevis?
- Burundi, at 9.0% against 8.8% in Saint Kitts and Nevis as of 2022.
- What is the difference in tariff rate for primary and manufactured products between Burundi and Saint Kitts and Nevis?
- 0.2%, with Burundi ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Burundi and Saint Kitts and Nevis?
- 16 years are reported by both, from 2002 to 2020.
- How do Burundi and Saint Kitts and Nevis rank globally for tariff rate for primary and manufactured products?
- Burundi ranks 48th and Saint Kitts and Nevis ranks 51st of 184 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- World Bank (WITS), UNCTAD (TRAINS), and World Trade Organization (WTO) (2026) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Tariff rate for primary and manufactured products. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Weighted mean applied tariff is the average of effectively applied rates weighted by the product import shares corresponding to each partner country.