North Macedonia vs Sao Tome and Principe: System of national accounts in use
System of national accounts in use over time
- North Macedonia
- Sao Tome and Principe
How they compare
North Macedonia currently reports 0.5 against 0.5 in Sao Tome and Principe, a difference of 0.
Across all 8 years both countries report, Sao Tome and Principe has been ahead every year.
North Macedonia ranks 149th and Sao Tome and Principe ranks 149th of 217 countries.
Sao Tome and Principe has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | North Macedonia | Sao Tome and Principe | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 0.25 | 0.5 | 0.25 | Sao Tome and Principe |
| 2020s | 0.5 | 0.5 | 0 | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher system of national accounts in use, North Macedonia or Sao Tome and Principe?
- North Macedonia, at 0.5 against 0.5 in Sao Tome and Principe as of 2023.
- What is the difference in system of national accounts in use between North Macedonia and Sao Tome and Principe?
- 0, with North Macedonia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for North Macedonia and Sao Tome and Principe?
- 8 years are reported by both, from 2016 to 2023.
- How do North Macedonia and Sao Tome and Principe rank globally for system of national accounts in use?
- North Macedonia ranks 149th and Sao Tome and Principe ranks 149th of 217 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statistical Performance Indicators, The World Bank (https://datacatalog.worldbank.org/dataset/statistical-performance-indicators), published as System of national accounts in use. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The national accounts data are compiled using the concepts, definitions, framework, and methodology of the System of National Account 2008 (SNA2008) or European System of National and Regional Accounts (ESA 2010). The manual has evolved to meet the changing economic structure, to follow systematic accounting and ensure international compatibility.