French Polynesia vs Sao Tome and Principe: System of national accounts in use
French Polynesia
0.5
in 2023
Sao Tome and Principe
0.5
in 2023
French Polynesia rank
149th
Sao Tome and Principe rank
149th
System of national accounts in use over time
- French Polynesia
- Sao Tome and Principe
How they compare
French Polynesia currently reports 0.5 against 0.5 in Sao Tome and Principe, a difference of 0.
Across all 8 years both countries report, Sao Tome and Principe has been ahead every year.
French Polynesia ranks 149th and Sao Tome and Principe ranks 149th of 217 countries.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | French Polynesia | Sao Tome and Principe | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 0.5 | 0.5 | 0 | — |
| 2020s | 0.5 | 0.5 | 0 | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher system of national accounts in use, French Polynesia or Sao Tome and Principe?
- French Polynesia, at 0.5 against 0.5 in Sao Tome and Principe as of 2023.
- What is the difference in system of national accounts in use between French Polynesia and Sao Tome and Principe?
- 0, with French Polynesia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for French Polynesia and Sao Tome and Principe?
- 8 years are reported by both, from 2016 to 2023.
- How do French Polynesia and Sao Tome and Principe rank globally for system of national accounts in use?
- French Polynesia ranks 149th and Sao Tome and Principe ranks 149th of 217 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statistical Performance Indicators, The World Bank (https://datacatalog.worldbank.org/dataset/statistical-performance-indicators), published as System of national accounts in use. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The national accounts data are compiled using the concepts, definitions, framework, and methodology of the System of National Account 2008 (SNA2008) or European System of National and Regional Accounts (ESA 2010). The manual has evolved to meet the changing economic structure, to follow systematic accounting and ensure international compatibility.