Equatorial Guinea vs Sao Tome and Principe: System of national accounts in use
System of national accounts in use over time
- Equatorial Guinea
- Sao Tome and Principe
How they compare
Equatorial Guinea currently reports 0.5 against 0.5 in Sao Tome and Principe, a difference of 0.
Across all 8 years both countries report, Sao Tome and Principe has been ahead every year.
Equatorial Guinea ranks 149th and Sao Tome and Principe ranks 149th of 217 countries.
Sao Tome and Principe has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Equatorial Guinea | Sao Tome and Principe | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 0.25 | 0.5 | 0.25 | Sao Tome and Principe |
| 2020s | 0.5 | 0.5 | 0 | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher system of national accounts in use, Equatorial Guinea or Sao Tome and Principe?
- Equatorial Guinea, at 0.5 against 0.5 in Sao Tome and Principe as of 2023.
- What is the difference in system of national accounts in use between Equatorial Guinea and Sao Tome and Principe?
- 0, with Equatorial Guinea ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Equatorial Guinea and Sao Tome and Principe?
- 8 years are reported by both, from 2016 to 2023.
- How do Equatorial Guinea and Sao Tome and Principe rank globally for system of national accounts in use?
- Equatorial Guinea ranks 149th and Sao Tome and Principe ranks 149th of 217 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statistical Performance Indicators, The World Bank (https://datacatalog.worldbank.org/dataset/statistical-performance-indicators), published as System of national accounts in use. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The national accounts data are compiled using the concepts, definitions, framework, and methodology of the System of National Account 2008 (SNA2008) or European System of National and Regional Accounts (ESA 2010). The manual has evolved to meet the changing economic structure, to follow systematic accounting and ensure international compatibility.