Comoros vs Nepal: System of national accounts in use

Comoros
1
in 2023
Nepal
1
in 2023
Comoros rank
1st
Nepal rank
1st

System of national accounts in use over time

  • Comoros
  • Nepal
00.20.40.60.81201620192023

How they compare

Comoros currently reports 1 against 1 in Nepal, a difference of 0.

The two have swapped places 4 times across 8 shared years of data; in 2016 it was Nepal ahead.

Comoros ranks 1st and Nepal ranks 1st of 214 countries.

Across the 2 decades both report, Comoros averaged higher in 1 and Nepal in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Comoros Nepal Difference Ahead
2010s 0.375 0.5 0.125 Nepal
2020s 1 0.75 0.25 Comoros

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher system of national accounts in use, Comoros or Nepal?
Comoros, at 1 against 1 in Nepal as of 2023.
What is the difference in system of national accounts in use between Comoros and Nepal?
0, with Comoros ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Comoros and Nepal?
8 years are reported by both, from 2016 to 2023.
How do Comoros and Nepal rank globally for system of national accounts in use?
Comoros ranks 1st and Nepal ranks 1st of 214 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statistical Performance Indicators, The World Bank (https://datacatalog.worldbank.org/dataset/statistical-performance-indicators), published as System of national accounts in use. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
System of national accounts in use
Source
Statistical Performance Indicators, The World Bank (https://datacatalog.worldbank.org/dataset/statistical-performance-indicators)
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
217 places, 1,729 data points, 2016–2023
Last refreshed

The national accounts data are compiled using the concepts, definitions, framework, and methodology of the System of National Account 2008 (SNA2008) or European System of National and Regional Accounts (ESA 2010). The manual has evolved to meet the changing economic structure, to follow systematic accounting and ensure international compatibility.