Chile vs Lithuania: System of national accounts in use

Chile
1
in 2023
Lithuania
1
in 2023
Chile rank
1st
Lithuania rank
1st

System of national accounts in use over time

  • Chile
  • Lithuania
00.20.40.60.81201620192023

How they compare

Chile currently reports 1 against 1 in Lithuania, a difference of 0.

Across all 8 years both countries report, Lithuania has been ahead every year.

Chile ranks 1st and Lithuania ranks 1st of 214 countries.

Lithuania has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Chile Lithuania Difference Ahead
2010s 0.75 1 0.25 Lithuania
2020s 1 1 0

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher system of national accounts in use, Chile or Lithuania?
Chile, at 1 against 1 in Lithuania as of 2023.
What is the difference in system of national accounts in use between Chile and Lithuania?
0, with Chile ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Chile and Lithuania?
8 years are reported by both, from 2016 to 2023.
How do Chile and Lithuania rank globally for system of national accounts in use?
Chile ranks 1st and Lithuania ranks 1st of 214 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statistical Performance Indicators, The World Bank (https://datacatalog.worldbank.org/dataset/statistical-performance-indicators), published as System of national accounts in use. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
System of national accounts in use
Source
Statistical Performance Indicators, The World Bank (https://datacatalog.worldbank.org/dataset/statistical-performance-indicators)
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
217 places, 1,729 data points, 2016–2023
Last refreshed

The national accounts data are compiled using the concepts, definitions, framework, and methodology of the System of National Account 2008 (SNA2008) or European System of National and Regional Accounts (ESA 2010). The manual has evolved to meet the changing economic structure, to follow systematic accounting and ensure international compatibility.