Chad vs Equatorial Guinea: System of national accounts in use
Chad
0.5
in 2023
Equatorial Guinea
0.5
in 2023
Chad rank
148th
Equatorial Guinea rank
148th
System of national accounts in use over time
- Chad
- Equatorial Guinea
How they compare
Chad currently reports 0.5 against 0.5 in Equatorial Guinea, a difference of 0.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 8 shared years of data; in 2016 it was Chad ahead.
Chad ranks 148th and Equatorial Guinea ranks 148th of 217 countries.
Chad has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Chad | Equatorial Guinea | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 0.5 | 0.25 | 0.25 | Chad |
| 2020s | 0.5 | 0.5 | 0 | β |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher system of national accounts in use, Chad or Equatorial Guinea?
- Chad, at 0.5 against 0.5 in Equatorial Guinea as of 2023.
- What is the difference in system of national accounts in use between Chad and Equatorial Guinea?
- 0, with Chad ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Chad and Equatorial Guinea?
- 8 years are reported by both, from 2016 to 2023.
- How do Chad and Equatorial Guinea rank globally for system of national accounts in use?
- Chad ranks 148th and Equatorial Guinea ranks 148th of 217 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statistical Performance Indicators, The World Bank (https://datacatalog.worldbank.org/dataset/statistical-performance-indicators), published as System of national accounts in use. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The national accounts data are compiled using the concepts, definitions, framework, and methodology of the System of National Account 2008 (SNA2008) or European System of National and Regional Accounts (ESA 2010). The manual has evolved to meet the changing economic structure, to follow systematic accounting and ensure international compatibility.