Costa Rica vs Latvia: SUT Use, Value added and its components by activity — Compensation of

Costa Rica
17.80 million National currency
in 2021
Latvia
19,668 National currency
in 2023
Costa Rica rank
6th
Latvia rank
5th

SUT Use, Value added and its components by activity — Compensation of over time

  • Costa Rica
  • Latvia
05.0M10.0M15.0M20.0M201020162023

How they compare

Costa Rica currently reports 17.80 million National currency against 19,668 National currency in Latvia, a difference of 17.78 million National currency.

That makes Costa Rica's figure about 905.2 times Latvia's.

Across all 10 years both countries report, Costa Rica has been ahead every year.

Costa Rica ranks 6th and Latvia ranks 5th of 37 countries.

Costa Rica has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Costa Rica Latvia Difference Ahead
2010s 14.08 million National currency 11,523 National currency 14.06 million National currency Costa Rica
2020s 17.33 million National currency 15,460 National currency 17.31 million National currency Costa Rica

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher sut use, value added and its components by activity — compensation of, Costa Rica or Latvia?
Costa Rica, at 17.80 million National currency against 19,668 National currency in Latvia as of 2021.
What is the difference in sut use, value added and its components by activity — compensation of between Costa Rica and Latvia?
17.78 million National currency, with Costa Rica ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Costa Rica and Latvia?
10 years are reported by both, from 2012 to 2021.
How do Costa Rica and Latvia rank globally for sut use, value added and its components by activity — compensation of?
Costa Rica ranks 6th and Latvia ranks 5th of 37 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development, published as SUT Use, Value added and its components by activity — Compensation of employees. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Costa Rica vs Latvia: SUT Use, Value added and its components by activity — Compensation of. Statizoid, drawing on Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. Retrieved 24 September 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/sut-use-value-added-and-its-components-by-activity-compensation-of-employees/costa-rica/latvia-2/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under OECD Terms and Conditions (attribution required); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/sut-use-value-added-and-its-components-by-activity-compensation-of-employees/costa-rica/latvia-2/">Costa Rica vs Latvia: SUT Use, Value added and its components by activity — Compensation of</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
SUT Use, Value added and its components by activity — Compensation of employees
Unit
National currency
Source
Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development
Licence
OECD Terms and Conditions (attribution required)
Coverage
46 places, 638 data points, 1993–2024
Last refreshed

The dataset contains the value added block of the Use table and complements the dataset “SUT Use at purchasers' prices”. It describes output, intermediate consumption (use of a product as input into a production process) and value added disaggregated to show the elements of the generation of income account: compensation of employees (wages and salaries paid to employees and their employers’ social contributions),other taxes less subsidies on production, gross operating surplus (business profits), and gross mixed income (profits of the self-employed), broken down by activity at the 2-digit level of the International Standard Industrial Classification of All Economic Activities (ISIC) Rev 4 (containing 89 industries). The dataset has been prepared from statistics reported to the OECD by countries in their answers to the annual Supply and Use questionnaire. Information about data availability is available in SUT updates The dataset corresponds to SNA_TABLE41 dataset in the previous dissemination system. A mapping between the new codes and previous codes is available in SUT_USEVA_Codes_mapping Historical data for Korea from 2015 to 2019 is available here Historical data forNorway from 2010 to 2021 is available here Japanese data from 2011 to 2021 according to 2015 benchmark year is available here The file SUT_Tips contains further suggestions on how to navigate and use the various Supply and Use tables (SUTs) in the new dissemination system. Explore the OECD SUT webpage SUT webpage