Rwanda vs Tanzania: Sustainable Economic Opportunity

Rwanda
57.18
in 2011
Tanzania
54.19
in 2011
Rwanda rank
11th
Tanzania rank
14th

Sustainable Economic Opportunity over time

  • Rwanda
  • Tanzania
0204060200020052011

How they compare

Rwanda currently reports 57.18 against 54.19 in Tanzania, a difference of 2.99.

That makes Rwanda's figure about 1.1 times Tanzania's.

The two have swapped places 3 times across 12 shared years of data; in 2000 it was Tanzania ahead.

Rwanda ranks 11th and Tanzania ranks 14th of 52 countries.

Across the 2 decades both report, Rwanda averaged higher in 1 and Tanzania in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Rwanda Tanzania Difference Ahead
2000s 49.94 53.54 3.6 Tanzania
2010s 56.81 55.7 1.1 Rwanda

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher sustainable economic opportunity, Rwanda or Tanzania?
Rwanda, at 57.18 against 54.19 in Tanzania as of 2011.
What is the difference in sustainable economic opportunity between Rwanda and Tanzania?
2.99, with Rwanda ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Rwanda and Tanzania?
12 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2011.
How do Rwanda and Tanzania rank globally for sustainable economic opportunity?
Rwanda ranks 11th and Tanzania ranks 14th of 52 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Mo Ibrahim Foundation, electronic files and web site, published as Sustainable Economic Opportunity. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Sustainable Economic Opportunity
Source
Mo Ibrahim Foundation, electronic files and web site
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
58 places, 696 data points, 2000–2011
Last refreshed

Public Management: Within this subcategory the Ibrahim Index measures: (i) Quality of Public Administration – clustered indicator (average) of variables from the African Development Bank and the World Bank measuring the extent to which the civil service is structured to effectively and ethically design policy and deliver services. (ii) Quality of Budget Management – clustered indicator (average) of variables from the African Development Bank and the World Bank measuring the extent to which there is a comprehensive and credible budget, linked to policy priorities, with mechanisms to ensure implementation and reporting. (iii) Currency Inside Banks – total stock of currency held within banks as a proportion of the money supply in an economy (OD). (iv) Ratio of Total Revenue to Total Expenditure – total budget revenue as a proportion of total budget expenditure (OD). (v) Ratio of Budget Deficit or Surplus to GDP – budget deficit or budget surplus as a proportion of Gross Domestic Product. (vi) Management of Public Debt – clustered indicator (average) of variables from the African Development Bank and the World Bank measuring short- and medium term sustainability of fiscal policy and its impact on growth. (vii) Inflation – annual average change in the consumer price index. (viii) Ratio of External Debt Service to Exports – total external debt service due, expressed as a proportion of exports of goods, non-factor services, income and workers’ remittances. (ix) Imports Covered by Reserves – period of time that imports could be paid for by foreign exchange reserves. (x) Statistical Capacity – national statistical systems and their adherence to international norms in the areas of: Methodology (of compiling statistics and indicators); Regularity and coverage of censuses and surveys; Regularity, timeliness and accessibility of key socioeconomic indicators.