Burundi vs Equatorial Guinea: Sustainable Economic Opportunity

Burundi
40.13
in 2011
Equatorial Guinea
36.62
in 2011
Burundi rank
39th
Equatorial Guinea rank
42nd

Sustainable Economic Opportunity over time

  • Burundi
  • Equatorial Guinea
010203040200020052011

How they compare

Burundi currently reports 40.13 against 36.62 in Equatorial Guinea, a difference of 3.51.

That makes Burundi's figure about 1.1 times Equatorial Guinea's.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 12 shared years of data; in 2000 it was Burundi ahead.

Burundi ranks 39th and Equatorial Guinea ranks 42nd of 52 countries.

Burundi has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Burundi Equatorial Guinea Difference Ahead
2000s 35.61 30.95 4.66 Burundi
2010s 40.1 35.86 4.23 Burundi

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher sustainable economic opportunity, Burundi or Equatorial Guinea?
Burundi, at 40.13 against 36.62 in Equatorial Guinea as of 2011.
What is the difference in sustainable economic opportunity between Burundi and Equatorial Guinea?
3.51, with Burundi ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Burundi and Equatorial Guinea?
12 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2011.
How do Burundi and Equatorial Guinea rank globally for sustainable economic opportunity?
Burundi ranks 39th and Equatorial Guinea ranks 42nd of 52 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Mo Ibrahim Foundation, electronic files and web site, published as Sustainable Economic Opportunity. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Sustainable Economic Opportunity
Source
Mo Ibrahim Foundation, electronic files and web site
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
58 places, 696 data points, 2000–2011
Last refreshed

Public Management: Within this subcategory the Ibrahim Index measures: (i) Quality of Public Administration – clustered indicator (average) of variables from the African Development Bank and the World Bank measuring the extent to which the civil service is structured to effectively and ethically design policy and deliver services. (ii) Quality of Budget Management – clustered indicator (average) of variables from the African Development Bank and the World Bank measuring the extent to which there is a comprehensive and credible budget, linked to policy priorities, with mechanisms to ensure implementation and reporting. (iii) Currency Inside Banks – total stock of currency held within banks as a proportion of the money supply in an economy (OD). (iv) Ratio of Total Revenue to Total Expenditure – total budget revenue as a proportion of total budget expenditure (OD). (v) Ratio of Budget Deficit or Surplus to GDP – budget deficit or budget surplus as a proportion of Gross Domestic Product. (vi) Management of Public Debt – clustered indicator (average) of variables from the African Development Bank and the World Bank measuring short- and medium term sustainability of fiscal policy and its impact on growth. (vii) Inflation – annual average change in the consumer price index. (viii) Ratio of External Debt Service to Exports – total external debt service due, expressed as a proportion of exports of goods, non-factor services, income and workers’ remittances. (ix) Imports Covered by Reserves – period of time that imports could be paid for by foreign exchange reserves. (x) Statistical Capacity – national statistical systems and their adherence to international norms in the areas of: Methodology (of compiling statistics and indicators); Regularity and coverage of censuses and surveys; Regularity, timeliness and accessibility of key socioeconomic indicators.