LBN vs KNA: Sugar cane production
LBN
0 tonnes
in 2007
KNA
0 tonnes
in 2006
LBN rank
103rd
KNA rank
103rd
Sugar cane production over time
- LBN
- KNA
How they compare
LBN currently reports 0 tonnes against 0 tonnes in KNA, a difference of 0 tonnes.
Across all 46 years both countries report, KNA has been ahead every year.
LBN ranks 103rd and KNA ranks 103rd of 110 countries.
KNA has averaged higher in every one of the 5 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | LBN | KNA | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 1,351 tonnes | 351,413 tonnes | 350,062 tonnes | KNA |
| 1970s | 378.5 tonnes | 293,494 tonnes | 293,116 tonnes | KNA |
| 1980s | 1,447 tonnes | 291,887 tonnes | 290,441 tonnes | KNA |
| 1990s | 3,764 tonnes | 218,991 tonnes | 215,227 tonnes | KNA |
| 2000s | 671.43 tonnes | 161,255 tonnes | 160,584 tonnes | KNA |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher sugar cane production, LBN or KNA?
- LBN, at 0 tonnes against 0 tonnes in KNA as of 2007.
- What is the difference in sugar cane production between LBN and KNA?
- 0 tonnes, with LBN ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for LBN and KNA?
- 46 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2006.
- How do LBN and KNA rank globally for sugar cane production?
- LBN ranks 103rd and KNA ranks 103rd of 110 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (2025) – with major processing by Our World in Data, published as Sugar cane production. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Sugar cane production is measured in tonnes.