Sri Lanka vs Suriname: Statin use vs average non hdl cholesterol levels
Sri Lanka
3.3
in 2018
Suriname
3.3
in 2018
Sri Lanka rank
95th
Suriname rank
95th
Statin use vs average non hdl cholesterol levels over time
- Sri Lanka
- Suriname
How they compare
Sri Lanka currently reports 3.3 against 3.3 in Suriname, a difference of 0.
Across all 39 years both countries report, Suriname has been ahead every year.
Sri Lanka ranks 95th and Suriname ranks 95th of 191 countries.
Suriname has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Sri Lanka | Suriname | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1980s | 2.8 | 3.5 | 0.7 | Suriname |
| 1990s | 2.95 | 3.45 | 0.5 | Suriname |
| 2000s | 3.13 | 3.4 | 0.27 | Suriname |
| 2010s | 3.28 | 3.34 | 0.0667 | Suriname |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher statin use vs average non hdl cholesterol levels, Sri Lanka or Suriname?
- Sri Lanka, at 3.3 against 3.3 in Suriname as of 2018.
- What is the difference in statin use vs average non hdl cholesterol levels between Sri Lanka and Suriname?
- 0, with Sri Lanka ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Sri Lanka and Suriname?
- 39 years are reported by both, from 1980 to 2018.
- How do Sri Lanka and Suriname rank globally for statin use vs average non hdl cholesterol levels?
- Sri Lanka ranks 95th and Suriname ranks 95th of 191 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Our World in Data, published as Statin use vs average non hdl cholesterol levels. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.