Kiribati vs Laos: Statin use vs average non hdl cholesterol levels
Kiribati
3.3
in 2018
Laos
3.3
in 2018
Kiribati rank
95th
Laos rank
95th
Statin use vs average non hdl cholesterol levels over time
- Kiribati
- Laos
How they compare
Kiribati currently reports 3.3 against 3.3 in Laos, a difference of 0.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 39 shared years of data; in 1980 it was Kiribati ahead.
Kiribati ranks 95th and Laos ranks 95th of 191 countries.
Kiribati has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Kiribati | Laos | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1980s | 3.39 | 2.7 | 0.69 | Kiribati |
| 1990s | 3.4 | 2.91 | 0.49 | Kiribati |
| 2000s | 3.33 | 3.12 | 0.21 | Kiribati |
| 2010s | 3.3 | 3.28 | 0.0222 | Kiribati |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher statin use vs average non hdl cholesterol levels, Kiribati or Laos?
- Kiribati, at 3.3 against 3.3 in Laos as of 2018.
- What is the difference in statin use vs average non hdl cholesterol levels between Kiribati and Laos?
- 0, with Kiribati ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Kiribati and Laos?
- 39 years are reported by both, from 1980 to 2018.
- How do Kiribati and Laos rank globally for statin use vs average non hdl cholesterol levels?
- Kiribati ranks 95th and Laos ranks 95th of 191 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Our World in Data, published as Statin use vs average non hdl cholesterol levels. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.