Kazakhstan vs Nauru: Statin use vs average non hdl cholesterol levels
Kazakhstan
3.1
in 2018
Nauru
3.1
in 2018
Kazakhstan rank
134th
Nauru rank
134th
Statin use vs average non hdl cholesterol levels over time
- Kazakhstan
- Nauru
How they compare
Kazakhstan currently reports 3.1 against 3.1 in Nauru, a difference of 0.
Across all 39 years both countries report, Nauru has been ahead every year.
Kazakhstan ranks 134th and Nauru ranks 134th of 191 countries.
Nauru has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Kazakhstan | Nauru | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1980s | 3.3 | 4.02 | 0.72 | Nauru |
| 1990s | 3.25 | 4.07 | 0.82 | Nauru |
| 2000s | 3.17 | 3.76 | 0.59 | Nauru |
| 2010s | 3.1 | 3.32 | 0.2222 | Nauru |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher statin use vs average non hdl cholesterol levels, Kazakhstan or Nauru?
- Kazakhstan, at 3.1 against 3.1 in Nauru as of 2018.
- What is the difference in statin use vs average non hdl cholesterol levels between Kazakhstan and Nauru?
- 0, with Kazakhstan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Kazakhstan and Nauru?
- 39 years are reported by both, from 1980 to 2018.
- How do Kazakhstan and Nauru rank globally for statin use vs average non hdl cholesterol levels?
- Kazakhstan ranks 134th and Nauru ranks 134th of 191 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Our World in Data, published as Statin use vs average non hdl cholesterol levels. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.