Bangladesh vs Nauru: Statin use vs average non hdl cholesterol levels
Bangladesh
3.1
in 2018
Nauru
3.1
in 2018
Bangladesh rank
132nd
Nauru rank
132nd
Statin use vs average non hdl cholesterol levels over time
- Bangladesh
- Nauru
How they compare
Bangladesh currently reports 3.1 against 3.1 in Nauru, a difference of 0.
Across all 39 years both countries report, Nauru has been ahead every year.
Bangladesh ranks 132nd and Nauru ranks 132nd of 189 countries.
Nauru has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Bangladesh | Nauru | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1980s | 2.93 | 4.02 | 1.09 | Nauru |
| 1990s | 3.06 | 4.07 | 1.01 | Nauru |
| 2000s | 3.1 | 3.76 | 0.66 | Nauru |
| 2010s | 3.1 | 3.32 | 0.2222 | Nauru |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher statin use vs average non hdl cholesterol levels, Bangladesh or Nauru?
- Bangladesh, at 3.1 against 3.1 in Nauru as of 2018.
- What is the difference in statin use vs average non hdl cholesterol levels between Bangladesh and Nauru?
- 0, with Bangladesh ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Bangladesh and Nauru?
- 39 years are reported by both, from 1980 to 2018.
- How do Bangladesh and Nauru rank globally for statin use vs average non hdl cholesterol levels?
- Bangladesh ranks 132nd and Nauru ranks 132nd of 189 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Our World in Data, published as Statin use vs average non hdl cholesterol levels. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.