Finland vs New Zealand: State Capacity Index

Finland
2.34
in 2015
New Zealand
2.23
in 2015
Finland rank
6th
New Zealand rank
9th

State Capacity Index over time

  • Finland
  • New Zealand
0123196019872015

How they compare

Finland currently reports 2.34 against 2.23 in New Zealand, a difference of 0.11.

The two have swapped places 7 times across 56 shared years of data; in 1960 it was New Zealand ahead.

Finland ranks 6th and New Zealand ranks 9th of 165 countries.

Across the 6 decades both report, Finland averaged higher in 5 and New Zealand in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Finland New Zealand Difference Ahead
1960s 1.39 1.57 0.1874 New Zealand
1970s 2.03 1.93 0.1086 Finland
1980s 2.23 2.22 0.0034 Finland
1990s 2.38 2.31 0.0696 Finland
2000s 2.52 2.21 0.304 Finland
2010s 2.44 2.17 0.2703 Finland

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher state capacity index, Finland or New Zealand?
Finland, at 2.34 against 2.23 in New Zealand as of 2015.
What is the difference in state capacity index between Finland and New Zealand?
0.11, with Finland ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Finland and New Zealand?
56 years are reported by both, from 1960 to 2015.
How do Finland and New Zealand rank globally for state capacity index?
Finland ranks 6th and New Zealand ranks 9th of 165 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Jonathan Hanson and Rachel Sigman (2021); Population based on various sources (2023) – with major processing by Our World in Data, published as State Capacity Index. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
State Capacity Index
Source
Jonathan Hanson and Rachel Sigman (2021); Population based on various sources (2023) – with major processing by Our World in Data
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data)
Coverage
166 places, 8,015 data points, 1960–2015
Last refreshed

Measures state capacity by combining 21 different indicators related to three key dimensions: extractive capacity, coercive capacity, and administrative capacity. Higher values indicate greater state capacity.