Cote d'Ivoire vs Tajikistan: State Capacity Index

Cote d'Ivoire
-0.0714
in 2015
Tajikistan
-0.0292
in 2015
Cote d'Ivoire rank
127th
Tajikistan rank
124th

State Capacity Index over time

  • Cote d'Ivoire
  • Tajikistan
-1.5-1-0.500.5196019872015

How they compare

Tajikistan currently reports -0.0292 against -0.0714 in Cote d'Ivoire, a difference of 0.0422.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 25 shared years of data; in 1991 it was Cote d'Ivoire ahead.

Cote d'Ivoire ranks 127th and Tajikistan ranks 124th of 165 countries.

Across the 3 decades both report, Cote d'Ivoire averaged higher in 2 and Tajikistan in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Cote d'Ivoire Tajikistan Difference Ahead
1990s 0.0239 -1.09 1.12 Cote d'Ivoire
2000s -0.3579 -0.54 0.1822 Cote d'Ivoire
2010s -0.3428 -0.0871 0.2556 Tajikistan

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher state capacity index, Cote d'Ivoire or Tajikistan?
Tajikistan, at -0.0292 against -0.0714 in Cote d'Ivoire as of 2015.
What is the difference in state capacity index between Cote d'Ivoire and Tajikistan?
0.0422, with Tajikistan ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Cote d'Ivoire and Tajikistan?
25 years are reported by both, from 1991 to 2015.
How do Cote d'Ivoire and Tajikistan rank globally for state capacity index?
Cote d'Ivoire ranks 127th and Tajikistan ranks 124th of 165 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Jonathan Hanson and Rachel Sigman (2021); Population based on various sources (2023) – with major processing by Our World in Data, published as State Capacity Index. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
State Capacity Index
Source
Jonathan Hanson and Rachel Sigman (2021); Population based on various sources (2023) – with major processing by Our World in Data
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data)
Coverage
166 places, 8,015 data points, 1960–2015
Last refreshed

Measures state capacity by combining 21 different indicators related to three key dimensions: extractive capacity, coercive capacity, and administrative capacity. Higher values indicate greater state capacity.