Democratic Republic of Congo vs Sudan: State Capacity Index
Democratic Republic of Congo
-0.9912
in 2015
Sudan
-0.8835
in 2015
Democratic Republic of Congo rank
157th
Sudan rank
155th
State Capacity Index over time
- Democratic Republic of Congo
- Sudan
How they compare
Sudan currently reports -0.8835 against -0.9912 in Democratic Republic of Congo, a difference of 0.1077.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 56 shared years of data; in 1960 it was Sudan ahead.
Democratic Republic of Congo ranks 157th and Sudan ranks 155th of 166 countries.
Sudan has averaged higher in every one of the 6 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Democratic Republic of Congo | Sudan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | -1.26 | -0.6203 | 0.6422 | Sudan |
| 1970s | -1.1 | -0.9141 | 0.1855 | Sudan |
| 1980s | -1.16 | -0.5803 | 0.5805 | Sudan |
| 1990s | -1.33 | -0.9726 | 0.3565 | Sudan |
| 2000s | -1.32 | -0.9708 | 0.345 | Sudan |
| 2010s | -1.22 | -1.02 | 0.2045 | Sudan |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher state capacity index, Democratic Republic of Congo or Sudan?
- Sudan, at -0.8835 against -0.9912 in Democratic Republic of Congo as of 2015.
- What is the difference in state capacity index between Democratic Republic of Congo and Sudan?
- 0.1077, with Sudan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Democratic Republic of Congo and Sudan?
- 56 years are reported by both, from 1960 to 2015.
- How do Democratic Republic of Congo and Sudan rank globally for state capacity index?
- Democratic Republic of Congo ranks 157th and Sudan ranks 155th of 166 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Jonathan Hanson and Rachel Sigman (2021); Population based on various sources (2023) β with major processing by Our World in Data, published as State Capacity Index. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Measures state capacity by combining 21 different indicators related to three key dimensions: extractive capacity, coercive capacity, and administrative capacity. Higher values indicate greater state capacity.