Chad vs Equatorial Guinea: State Capacity Index
Chad
-0.5349
in 2015
Equatorial Guinea
-0.5207
in 2015
Chad rank
148th
Equatorial Guinea rank
147th
State Capacity Index over time
- Chad
- Equatorial Guinea
How they compare
Equatorial Guinea currently reports -0.5207 against -0.5349 in Chad, a difference of 0.0142.
The two have swapped places 14 times across 48 shared years of data; in 1968 it was Equatorial Guinea ahead.
Chad ranks 148th and Equatorial Guinea ranks 147th of 166 countries.
Across the 6 decades both report, Chad averaged higher in 4 and Equatorial Guinea in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Chad | Equatorial Guinea | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | -1.14 | -0.8513 | 0.2867 | Equatorial Guinea |
| 1970s | -1.13 | -1.34 | 0.2107 | Chad |
| 1980s | -1.09 | -1.16 | 0.0739 | Chad |
| 1990s | -0.8434 | -0.9922 | 0.1489 | Chad |
| 2000s | -0.788 | -0.7732 | 0.0147 | Equatorial Guinea |
| 2010s | -0.7232 | -0.8159 | 0.0927 | Chad |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher state capacity index, Chad or Equatorial Guinea?
- Equatorial Guinea, at -0.5207 against -0.5349 in Chad as of 2015.
- What is the difference in state capacity index between Chad and Equatorial Guinea?
- 0.0142, with Equatorial Guinea ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Chad and Equatorial Guinea?
- 48 years are reported by both, from 1968 to 2015.
- How do Chad and Equatorial Guinea rank globally for state capacity index?
- Chad ranks 148th and Equatorial Guinea ranks 147th of 166 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Jonathan Hanson and Rachel Sigman (2021); Population based on various sources (2023) – with major processing by Our World in Data, published as State Capacity Index. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Measures state capacity by combining 21 different indicators related to three key dimensions: extractive capacity, coercive capacity, and administrative capacity. Higher values indicate greater state capacity.