Bangladesh vs Venezuela: State Capacity Index

Bangladesh
0.0123
in 2015
Venezuela
-0.026
in 2015
Bangladesh rank
121st
Venezuela rank
122nd

State Capacity Index over time

  • Bangladesh
  • Venezuela
-1-0.500.51196019872015

How they compare

Bangladesh currently reports 0.0123 against -0.026 in Venezuela, a difference of 0.0383.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 44 shared years of data; in 1972 it was Venezuela ahead.

Bangladesh ranks 121st and Venezuela ranks 122nd of 165 countries.

Venezuela has averaged higher in every one of the 5 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Bangladesh Venezuela Difference Ahead
1970s -0.4753 0.8553 1.33 Venezuela
1980s -0.5878 0.2686 0.8564 Venezuela
1990s -0.2688 0.2601 0.5289 Venezuela
2000s -0.2165 0.216 0.4325 Venezuela
2010s -0.0712 0.0521 0.1233 Venezuela

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher state capacity index, Bangladesh or Venezuela?
Bangladesh, at 0.0123 against -0.026 in Venezuela as of 2015.
What is the difference in state capacity index between Bangladesh and Venezuela?
0.0383, with Bangladesh ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Bangladesh and Venezuela?
44 years are reported by both, from 1972 to 2015.
How do Bangladesh and Venezuela rank globally for state capacity index?
Bangladesh ranks 121st and Venezuela ranks 122nd of 165 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Jonathan Hanson and Rachel Sigman (2021); Population based on various sources (2023) – with major processing by Our World in Data, published as State Capacity Index. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
State Capacity Index
Source
Jonathan Hanson and Rachel Sigman (2021); Population based on various sources (2023) – with major processing by Our World in Data
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data)
Coverage
166 places, 8,015 data points, 1960–2015
Last refreshed

Measures state capacity by combining 21 different indicators related to three key dimensions: extractive capacity, coercive capacity, and administrative capacity. Higher values indicate greater state capacity.