Rwanda vs United Arab Emirates: Stability of Democratic Institutions Index

Rwanda
2
in 2025
United Arab Emirates
2
in 2025
Rwanda rank
84th
United Arab Emirates rank
84th

Stability of Democratic Institutions Index over time

  • Rwanda
  • United Arab Emirates
00.511.522.5200520152025

How they compare

Rwanda currently reports 2 against 2 in United Arab Emirates, a difference of 0.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 11 shared years of data; in 2005 it was Rwanda ahead.

Rwanda ranks 84th and United Arab Emirates ranks 84th of 128 countries.

Across the 3 decades both report, Rwanda averaged higher in 1 and United Arab Emirates in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade Rwanda United Arab Emirates Difference Ahead
2000s 2 1.33 0.6667 Rwanda
2010s 2 2.4 0.4 United Arab Emirates
2020s 2 2.33 0.3333 United Arab Emirates

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher stability of democratic institutions index, Rwanda or United Arab Emirates?
Rwanda, at 2 against 2 in United Arab Emirates as of 2025.
What is the difference in stability of democratic institutions index between Rwanda and United Arab Emirates?
0, with Rwanda ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Rwanda and United Arab Emirates?
11 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2025.
How do Rwanda and United Arab Emirates rank globally for stability of democratic institutions index?
Rwanda ranks 84th and United Arab Emirates ranks 84th of 128 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Bertelsmann Transformation Index (2026) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Stability of Democratic Institutions Index. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Stability of Democratic Institutions Index
Source
Bertelsmann Transformation Index (2026) – processed by Our World in Data
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data)
Coverage
128 places, 1,394 data points, 2005–2025
Last refreshed

Indicates the extent to which democratic institutions are effective and efficient and all relevant actors accept them.