Madagascar vs Papua New Guinea: Stability of Democratic Institutions Index

Madagascar
3
in 2025
Papua New Guinea
3
in 2025
Madagascar rank
57th
Papua New Guinea rank
57th

Stability of Democratic Institutions Index over time

  • Madagascar
  • Papua New Guinea
02468200520152025

How they compare

Madagascar currently reports 3 against 3 in Papua New Guinea, a difference of 0.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 11 shared years of data; in 2005 it was Madagascar ahead.

Madagascar ranks 57th and Papua New Guinea ranks 57th of 128 countries.

Across the 3 decades both report, Madagascar averaged higher in 1 and Papua New Guinea in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade Madagascar Papua New Guinea Difference Ahead
2000s 7.5 5.33 2.17 Madagascar
2010s 4.7 5.7 1 Papua New Guinea
2020s 3 4.17 1.17 Papua New Guinea

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher stability of democratic institutions index, Madagascar or Papua New Guinea?
Madagascar, at 3 against 3 in Papua New Guinea as of 2025.
What is the difference in stability of democratic institutions index between Madagascar and Papua New Guinea?
0, with Madagascar ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Madagascar and Papua New Guinea?
11 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2025.
How do Madagascar and Papua New Guinea rank globally for stability of democratic institutions index?
Madagascar ranks 57th and Papua New Guinea ranks 57th of 128 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Bertelsmann Transformation Index (2026) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Stability of Democratic Institutions Index. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Stability of Democratic Institutions Index
Source
Bertelsmann Transformation Index (2026) – processed by Our World in Data
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data)
Coverage
128 places, 1,394 data points, 2005–2025
Last refreshed

Indicates the extent to which democratic institutions are effective and efficient and all relevant actors accept them.