Central African Republic vs Zimbabwe: Stability of Democratic Institutions Index
Central African Republic
2.5
in 2025
Zimbabwe
2.5
in 2025
Central African Republic rank
76th
Zimbabwe rank
76th
Stability of Democratic Institutions Index over time
- Central African Republic
- Zimbabwe
How they compare
Central African Republic currently reports 2.5 against 2.5 in Zimbabwe, a difference of 0.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 11 shared years of data; in 2005 it was Central African Republic ahead.
Central African Republic ranks 76th and Zimbabwe ranks 76th of 128 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Central African Republic averaged higher in 1 and Zimbabwe in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Central African Republic | Zimbabwe | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 2.5 | 2 | 0.5 | Central African Republic |
| 2010s | 2.5 | 2.9 | 0.4 | Zimbabwe |
| 2020s | 2.5 | 2.83 | 0.3333 | Zimbabwe |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher stability of democratic institutions index, Central African Republic or Zimbabwe?
- Central African Republic, at 2.5 against 2.5 in Zimbabwe as of 2025.
- What is the difference in stability of democratic institutions index between Central African Republic and Zimbabwe?
- 0, with Central African Republic ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Central African Republic and Zimbabwe?
- 11 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2025.
- How do Central African Republic and Zimbabwe rank globally for stability of democratic institutions index?
- Central African Republic ranks 76th and Zimbabwe ranks 76th of 128 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Bertelsmann Transformation Index (2026) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Stability of Democratic Institutions Index. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Indicates the extent to which democratic institutions are effective and efficient and all relevant actors accept them.