Oman vs Serbia: Spending by international visitors while visiting a country … gaps
Spending by international visitors while visiting a country … gaps over time
- Oman
- Serbia
How they compare
Oman currently reports 3.70 billion current US$ against 3.47 billion current US$ in Serbia, a difference of 232.15 million current US$.
That makes Oman's figure about 1.1 times Serbia's.
The two have swapped places 4 times across 22 shared years of data; in 2002 it was Oman ahead.
Oman ranks 71st and Serbia ranks 74th of 203 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Oman averaged higher in 2 and Serbia in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Oman | Serbia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 770.50 million current US$ | 537.25 million current US$ | 233.25 million current US$ | Oman |
| 2010s | 2.16 billion current US$ | 1.42 billion current US$ | 744.30 million current US$ | Oman |
| 2020s | 1.79 billion current US$ | 2.53 billion current US$ | 741.97 million current US$ | Serbia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher spending by international visitors while visiting a country, gaps, Oman or Serbia?
- Oman, at 3.70 billion current US$ against 3.47 billion current US$ in Serbia as of 2023.
- What is the difference in spending by international visitors while visiting a country, gaps between Oman and Serbia?
- 232.15 million current US$, with Oman ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Oman and Serbia?
- 22 years are reported by both, from 2002 to 2023.
- How do Oman and Serbia rank globally for spending by international visitors while visiting a country, gaps?
- Oman ranks 71st and Serbia ranks 74th of 203 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Spending by international visitors while visiting a country, gaps filled. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Spending by international visitors while visiting a country with 58 missing years estimated by linear interpolation between the nearest real observations. Only gaps of 4 years or fewer are filled, and never beyond the first or last actual measurement — these are filled holes, not forecasts.