Rwanda vs Sao Tome and Principe: Spending by a country’s residents while travelling abroad, per square

Rwanda
15,720 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Sao Tome and Principe
17,657 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2022
Rwanda rank
91st
Sao Tome and Principe rank
88th

Spending by a country’s residents while travelling abroad, per square over time

  • Rwanda
  • Sao Tome and Principe
05.0k10.0k15.0k20.0k199520092023

How they compare

Sao Tome and Principe currently reports 17,657 current US$ per square kilometre against 15,720 current US$ per square kilometre in Rwanda, a difference of 1,937 current US$ per square kilometre.

That makes Sao Tome and Principe's figure about 1.1 times Rwanda's.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 15 shared years of data; in 1998 it was Sao Tome and Principe ahead.

Rwanda ranks 91st and Sao Tome and Principe ranks 88th of 189 countries.

Across the 4 decades both report, Rwanda averaged higher in 2 and Sao Tome and Principe in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade Rwanda Sao Tome and Principe Difference Ahead
1990s 1,074 current US$ per square kilometre 2,135 current US$ per square kilometre 1,061 current US$ per square kilometre Sao Tome and Principe
2000s 3,584 current US$ per square kilometre 1,074 current US$ per square kilometre 2,510 current US$ per square kilometre Rwanda
2010s 5,337 current US$ per square kilometre 1,771 current US$ per square kilometre 3,566 current US$ per square kilometre Rwanda
2020s 8,634 current US$ per square kilometre 13,895 current US$ per square kilometre 5,261 current US$ per square kilometre Sao Tome and Principe

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher spending by a country’s residents while travelling abroad, per square, Rwanda or Sao Tome and Principe?
Sao Tome and Principe, at 17,657 current US$ per square kilometre against 15,720 current US$ per square kilometre in Rwanda as of 2022.
What is the difference in spending by a country’s residents while travelling abroad, per square between Rwanda and Sao Tome and Principe?
1,937 current US$ per square kilometre, with Sao Tome and Principe ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Rwanda and Sao Tome and Principe?
15 years are reported by both, from 1998 to 2022.
How do Rwanda and Sao Tome and Principe rank globally for spending by a country’s residents while travelling abroad, per square?
Rwanda ranks 91st and Sao Tome and Principe ranks 88th of 189 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Spending by a country’s residents while travelling abroad, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Rwanda vs Sao Tome and Principe: Spending by a country’s residents while travelling abroad, per square. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 29 September 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/spending-by-a-country-s-residents-while-travelling-abroad-per-square-kilometre/rwanda/sao-tome-and-principe/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/spending-by-a-country-s-residents-while-travelling-abroad-per-square-kilometre/rwanda/sao-tome-and-principe/">Rwanda vs Sao Tome and Principe: Spending by a country’s residents while travelling abroad, per square</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Spending by a country’s residents while travelling abroad, per square kilometre
Unit
current US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
189 places, 4,392 data points, 1995–2023
Last refreshed

Spending by a country’s residents while travelling abroad divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.