Bangladesh vs Sao Tome and Principe: Spending by a country’s residents while travelling abroad, per square

Bangladesh
18,039 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Sao Tome and Principe
17,657 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2022
Bangladesh rank
86th
Sao Tome and Principe rank
88th

Spending by a country’s residents while travelling abroad, per square over time

  • Bangladesh
  • Sao Tome and Principe
05.0k10.0k15.0k20.0k199620092023

How they compare

Bangladesh currently reports 18,039 current US$ per square kilometre against 17,657 current US$ per square kilometre in Sao Tome and Principe, a difference of 382 current US$ per square kilometre.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 18 shared years of data; in 1998 it was Bangladesh ahead.

Bangladesh ranks 86th and Sao Tome and Principe ranks 88th of 189 countries.

Across the 4 decades both report, Bangladesh averaged higher in 3 and Sao Tome and Principe in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Bangladesh Sao Tome and Principe Difference Ahead
1990s 2,570 current US$ per square kilometre 2,135 current US$ per square kilometre 434.3 current US$ per square kilometre Bangladesh
2000s 3,626 current US$ per square kilometre 1,346 current US$ per square kilometre 2,280 current US$ per square kilometre Bangladesh
2010s 6,512 current US$ per square kilometre 1,771 current US$ per square kilometre 4,741 current US$ per square kilometre Bangladesh
2020s 8,699 current US$ per square kilometre 13,895 current US$ per square kilometre 5,196 current US$ per square kilometre Sao Tome and Principe

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher spending by a country’s residents while travelling abroad, per square, Bangladesh or Sao Tome and Principe?
Bangladesh, at 18,039 current US$ per square kilometre against 17,657 current US$ per square kilometre in Sao Tome and Principe as of 2023.
What is the difference in spending by a country’s residents while travelling abroad, per square between Bangladesh and Sao Tome and Principe?
382 current US$ per square kilometre, with Bangladesh ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Bangladesh and Sao Tome and Principe?
18 years are reported by both, from 1998 to 2022.
How do Bangladesh and Sao Tome and Principe rank globally for spending by a country’s residents while travelling abroad, per square?
Bangladesh ranks 86th and Sao Tome and Principe ranks 88th of 189 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Spending by a country’s residents while travelling abroad, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Bangladesh vs Sao Tome and Principe: Spending by a country’s residents while travelling abroad, per square. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 29 September 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/spending-by-a-country-s-residents-while-travelling-abroad-per-square-kilometre/bangladesh/sao-tome-and-principe/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/spending-by-a-country-s-residents-while-travelling-abroad-per-square-kilometre/bangladesh/sao-tome-and-principe/">Bangladesh vs Sao Tome and Principe: Spending by a country’s residents while travelling abroad, per square</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Spending by a country’s residents while travelling abroad, per square kilometre
Unit
current US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
189 places, 4,392 data points, 1995–2023
Last refreshed

Spending by a country’s residents while travelling abroad divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.